Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Osahenrumwen Ojo v. Hillsborough County Department of

May 3, 2012

OSAHENRUMWEN OJO
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Landya McCafferty United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed "Motion: for Report of Violation of Rules" (doc. no. 30). Defendants object (doc. no. 31).

Defendants' objection was filed beyond the deadline for responding to the underlying motion (doc. no. 30). The court notes, however, that defendants' objection (doc. no. 31) includes a request for an extension of time, until May 15, 2012, to file a supplemental response to plaintiff's motion (doc. no. 30). Defendants' request for an extension of time is supported by good cause. The court therefore grants the requested extension nunc pro tunc, and directs defendants to file a further response to plaintiff's motion (doc. no. 30) by May 15, 2012. After the filing of defendants' response, plaintiff will be granted fourteen days to file a reply thereto.

The substance of plaintiff's motion (doc. no. 30), as well as defendants' substantive objection (doc. no. 31), are taken under advisement. The court will consider the merits of plaintiff's motion, and defendants' objections and responses thereto, upon filing of the documents authorized in this order.

SO ORDERED.

cc:

LBM:jba

20120503

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.