Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Daniel Riley v. United States of America

July 12, 2012

DANIEL RILEY
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Margaret J. Kravchuk U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ON NONCONFORMING DOCUMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 5.2 DOCUMENT/FILER: #15, MOTION to Amend [1] Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255 and Other Clarifications filed by Daniel Riley. DATE: July 9, 2012

The document above fails to comply with: LR 15.1(a) & (b).

(a) Motions. A party who moves to amend a filing shall (i) attach the proposed amended filing to the motion to amend, (ii) identify in the motion or a supporting memorandum any new factual allegations, legal claims, or parties, and (iii) explain why any new allegations, claims, or parties were not included in the original filing.

(b) Amended Pleadings. Any amendment to a pleading, whether filed as a matter of course or upon a motion to amend, shall reproduce the entire filing as amended and may not incorporate any prior filing by reference, except by leave of court.

The document will remain on file. Unless a document curing the defect is filed by July 23, 2012, the original document will be treated as withdrawn and will not be ruled upon by a judicial officer.

SO ORDERED.

cc:

20120712

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.