Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The State of New Hampshire v. Thomas White

December 7, 2012

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
v.
THOMAS WHITE



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hicks, J.

a.m. on the morning of their release. The direct address of the court's home page is: http://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme.

Argued: October 11, 2012

The State appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Tucker, J.) dismissing its indictment against the defendant, Thomas White, for violating RSA 651-B:4-a (Supp. 2012), which requires registered sex offenders to report to law enforcement the creation of an "online identifier." We reverse and remand.

RSA 651-B:4-a requires registered sex offenders to report to law enforcement "any changes to an existing online identifier, or the creation of any new online identifier," before using it. "[O]nline identifier" includes "electronic

mail address, instant message screen name, user identification, user profile information, and chat or other Internet communication name or identity information." The indictment alleged that the defendant "did knowingly fail to . . . report a MySpace account" as required under the statute. The trial court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the defendant used his own name and already-reported e-mail address to create the account; thus, the trial court concluded, the defendant was not required under the statute to report the account's existence. The State contests the basis of the trial court's ruling.

Resolving this dispute requires that we engage in statutory interpretation. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we decide de novo. State v. Etienne, 163 N.H. 57, 71 (2011). In matters of statutory interpretation, we are the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of a statute considered as a whole. Id. We construe the Criminal Code "according to the fair import of [its] terms and to promote justice." RSA 625:3 (2007). In so doing, we must first look to the plain language of the statute to determine legislative intent. Etienne, 163 N.H. at 72. Absent an ambiguity we will not look beyond the language of the statute to discern legislative intent. Id. Our goal is to apply statutes in light of the legislature's intent in enacting them, and in light of the policy sought to be advanced by the entire statutory scheme. Id. Accordingly, we interpret a statute in the context of the overall statutory scheme and not in isolation. Id.

The trial court concluded that the defendant's alleged failure to report the creation and use of a Myspace account did not violate RSA 651-B:4-a because he used his own name and previously-reported e-mail address to become a member. In the trial court's view, the defendant would be obligated to report the use of a name or e-mail address by which he intended to be identified on Myspace only if it differed from his already-reported name or e- mail address. The State contends that the trial court erred in so concluding because the account constituted either "user profile information" or "chat or other Internet communication name or identity information." RSA 651-B:4-a. The defendant argues that the trial court's decision was correct and, in the alternative, that the statute is unconstitutionally vague if construed to require him to report his Myspace account.

We agree with the State that a Myspace account constitutes an "online identifier" under RSA 651-B:4-a. As noted, we first turn to the statute's plain language. The relevant definition of "user" is "[o]ne who uses a computer, computer program, or online service." American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 1908 (5th ed. 2011); see Webster's Third New International Dictionary 2524 (unabridged ed. 2002) ("one that uses"). A "profile" is "a biographical account presenting the subject's most noteworthy characteristics and achievements." American Heritage, supra at 1407; see Webster's, supra at 1811 ("a concise geographical, historical, or political sketch"). Consistent with these definitions, the trial court explained that "'[p]rofile creation is accomplished by filling out a series of virtual forms eliciting a broad range of personal data,'" whereby "'users are commonly asked to provide their name, home address, e-mail address, age, sex, location, and birth date.'" (Quoting Petrashek, Comment, The Fourth Amendment and the Brave New World of Online Social Networking, 93 Marq. L. Rev. 1495, 1499 (2010).)

The trial court defined Myspace as "'a "social networking" website where members can create "profiles" and interact with other members.'" (Quoting Griffin v. State, 19 A.3d 415, 417 n.2 (Md. 2011).) The court noted:

Anyone with Internet access can go onto the Myspace website and view content which is open to the general public such as . . . members' profiles which are not set as "private." However, to create a profile, upload and display photographs, communicate with persons on the site, write "blogs," and/or utilize other services or applications on the Myspace website, one must be a "member."

(Quoting Griffin, 19 A.3d at 417 n.2.) With this description in mind, it is apparent that Myspace membership requires the creation of a personal "profile" or "biographical account," American Heritage, supra at 1407, triggering an obligation to report its creation to law enforcement under RSA 651-B:4-a. The defendant's Myspace profile itself contains several such pieces of biographical information, including his name, age, sex, "single" relationship status, and zodiac sign. Indeed, the plain language of the phrase "user profile information," RSA 651-B:4-a, is at odds with the trial court's statement that the defendant was "not obligated to report. . . that he created a MySpace profile, or the information he posted to the profile." (Emphases added.)

Nor does the fact that the defendant used his already-reported e-mail address to establish the account militate against finding an obligation to report the account's creation to law enforcement. On the contrary, it highlights that the legislature differentiated between "electronic mail address" and "user profile information," RSA 651-B:4-a, as independent examples of online identifiers. See Pennelli v. Town of Pelham, 148 N.H. 365, 367-68 (2002) ("Basic statutory construction rules require that all of the words of a statute must be given effect and that the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words." (quotation omitted)). As is clear from the trial court's order, the user's Myspace account and profile are independent of the user's other methods of online communication or activity, such as an e-mail address.

Construing "user profile" to include the defendant's Myspace account also comports with the general purposes of sex offender registration and reporting requirements, including the twin goals of "investigating crimes committed online by registered sex offenders" and discouraging registered sex offenders "from engaging in such criminal activities." The National Guidelines for Sex Offender Registration and Notification, 73 Fed. Reg. 38030, 38055 (July 2, 2008) (final guidelines interpreting and implementing Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA)); see 42 U.S.C. § 16901 (2006) (SORNA's purpose is to "protect the public from sex offenders and offenders against children . . . [by] establish[ing] a comprehensive national system for the registration of those offenders."); cf. RSA 651-B:12 (2007) (sex offender registration and reporting requirements to be interpreted as consistent with federal law). Requiring a registered offender to report the creation of a Myspace profile or other "online profile" promotes the investigatory purpose of the statute by providing law enforcement with the means to monitor and track the offender's online activities. Such a requirement also serves to discourage the use of social networking for predatory purposes because the offender knows he or she is under the watchful eye of law enforcement. To the extent that our interpretation of the phrase "user profile information" may require sex offenders to report a wide range of online activities, it does so as a reflection of legislative intent expressed in the statute's plain terms. Here, of course, we need not define the outer limits of the reporting requirement of RSA 651-B:4-a.

The defendant observes that a Nebraska statute contains a reporting requirement with language that, he claims, is considerably broader than that of RSA 651-B:4-a, as it obligates sex offenders to report "all blogs and Internet sites maintained by the person or to which the person has uploaded any content or posted any messages or information." Neb. Rev. Stat. ยง 29- 4006 (1) (s) (Supp. 2010). The New Hampshire legislature, according to the defendant, could have enacted similar language had it intended to extend the reporting requirement to cover the creation of a Myspace account. We have concluded, however, that the plain ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.