Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Frank Ginnie and Karen Ginnie v. Target Corporation

March 7, 2013

FRANK GINNIE AND KAREN GINNIE PLAINTIFFS
v.
TARGET CORPORATION, AND BERGENSONS PROPERTY SERVICE, INC. DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge

ORDER

Re: (Document No. 4)

Motion to Remand

Ruling: Denied; See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1446(b)(3) and (c)(3)(A); Huffman v. Saul Holdings Ltd. Partnership, 194 F.3d 1072, 1077-78 (10th Cir. 1999). The initial pleading was uncertain as to the amount in controversy and defendants removed within 30 days of the date upon which defendants received a copy of a pleading from which it could first be ascertained that the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional amount (defendant has no duty to inquire or investigate even if state complaint contains clues as to removeability based on jurisdictional amount).

cc:

20130307

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.