JOSEPH N. LaPLANTE, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff filed a Motion to Extend Time to File an Appeal on March 4, 2013. The Court construed the motion as a request to extend time to file a response to the February 11, 2013 Report and Recommendation. A response due date of April 8, 2013 was ordered.
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated February 11, 2013. "[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'" School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co. , 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs. , 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete , 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Additionally, finding that the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the ...