REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
LANDYA McCAFFERTY, Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is Perfetto's notice of voluntary withdrawal of this action (doc. no. 31), and three other motions he has filed (doc. nos. 23, 24, and 29). The court construes the notice (doc. no. 31) as a motion to allow Perfetto to voluntarily dismiss this case, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although Perfetto states that he sent defendants a copy of his notice, defendants have not responded to his request to dismiss.
Perfetto states that he does not wish to pursue this action. Further, the notice of voluntary withdrawal states Perfetto's intention to exhaust his administrative remedies on his claims and then refile an action in this or another court. Perfetto's request to voluntarily dismiss this matter (doc. no. 31) should thus be granted, and the action should be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). The other pending motions filed by Perfetto (doc. nos. 23, 24, and 29) should be denied as moot.
Any objections to this report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's order. See United States v. De Jesús-Viera , 655 F.3d 52, 57 (1st Cir. 2011); Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co. , 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (only issues fairly raised by objections to magistrate ...