Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Martinez-Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit

April 1, 2016

OSCAR J. MARTÍNEZ-HERNÁNDEZ, a/k/a Cali, Defendant, Appellant


         Rafael F. Castro Lang, for appellant.

         Juan Carlos Reyes-Ramos, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Nelson Pé rez-Sosa, Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, Appellate Division, and Rosa Emilia Rodrí guez-Vé lez, United States Attorney, were on brief, for appellee.

         Before Lynch, Selya, and Lipez, Circuit Judges.


Page 40

          LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

          These consolidated appeals from Oscar Martínez-Hernández's guilty plea entered on August 7, 2012, divide into several parts, not all of which are within our jurisdiction.

         One set of issues concerning Martínez-Hernández's former counsel's purported conflict of interest was presented to the district court before sentencing. The district court's denial of Martínez-Hernández's claim was timely appealed in appeal number 13-1450. The argument is that

Page 41

Martínez-Hernández's earlier retained defense counsel Sonia I. Torres Pabón (" Torres" ), formerly employed by the United States Attorney's Office (" USAO" ) in Puerto Rico, had a disqualifying conflict of interest based on her involvement with one of the indictments that was dismissed as part of Martínez-Hernández's plea bargain. We affirm the district court's rejection of this claim. The district court properly concluded that there was no conflict and that the defendant was not prejudiced by his former counsel's representation.

         The second appeal, however, concerns arguments first made to the district court after Martínez-Hernández's sentence was imposed on March 5, 2013, and judgment was entered on March 11, 2013. Appellate counsel characterizes these new claims as " supplement[ing] and elaborat[ing] [on] the issues that had already been raised by [the defendant]'s previous counsel prior to and after sentencing." He argues that these new post-judgment arguments involving other facts and claims were within the jurisdiction of the district court but denies they were brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We hold counsel to his word and treat the arguments as not having been made to the district court under § 2255, as no such petition was ever filed. At least some of these claims, those which come as part of appeal number 15-1254, were not properly before the district court, and so the district court had no jurisdiction to hear them. Accordingly, we dismiss the defendant's appeal that stems from the rejection of this belated second set of claims.

         We leave the defendant to whatever post-conviction remedies he may have, without further discussion.


         Martínez-Hernández pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances within 1,000 feet of property comprising a school, public housing project, and/or playground, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § § 841, 846, and 860, and was sentenced to 300 months of imprisonment.

         Martínez-Hernández has a long history of serious criminal activity, including convictions for unlawful possession of firearms and possession with intent to distribute controlled substances. In 1999, Martínez-Hernández was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder in Puerto Rico, after which he went into hiding. He was sentenced in absentia by a Puerto Rico court to two consecutive life terms of imprisonment. Around the year 2000, Martínez-Hernández fled to South America and eventually established residence in Venezuela. Between 1999 and 2001, three indictments related to drug-trafficking conspiracies were issued for Martínez-Hernández in federal criminal cases 99-351, 99-352, and 01-379, in the District of Puerto Rico.

         On June 27, 2011, Martínez-Hernández was charged, in a federal indictment in Puerto Rico (criminal case 11-241), with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances, possession with intent to distribute heroin, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. The indictment included 114 defendants. A superseding indictment was issued on September 19, 2011.

         In December 2011, Martínez-Hernández was arrested by Venezuelan authorities, and in January 2012, he was sent to Puerto Rico.

         Martínez-Hernández was initially represented in all four indictments by Ricardo Izurieta. However, he then retained attorney Esther Castro Schmidt (" Castro" ), who filed a notice of appearance in criminal

Page 42

cases 99-351, 99-352, 01-379, and 11-241 on March 20, 2012. It is noteworthy that while Castro had previously served as an Assistant United States Attorney (" AUSA" ), Martínez-Hernández does not argue that Castro's former employment with the USAO itself posed a conflict.

         Martínez-Hernández also retained Torres, who filed a notice of appearance in these cases on May 2, 2012. Martínez-Hernández hired Torres based on Castro's recommendation that he " should hire Atty. Sonia Torres because she had good relations with the U.S. Attorney's Office and we could get a better agreement with her." Torres had been an AUSA from 1995 through 2006 and had served as Chief of the Criminal Division from about July 2002 through September 2006. Before assuming representation, Torres said that she took two steps to assure that she could represent Martínez-Hernández. First, she reviewed the dockets of Martínez-Hernández's federal cases. She found that there were two informative motions in criminal case 01-379 under her name: (1) a February 3, 2005, motion informing the court that a different AUSA had withdrawn from the case; and (2) a February 6, 2007, motion to withdraw herself from the case. Torres said that she told Martínez-Hernández about these motions prior to accepting his request for legal representation. Second, Torres asked First AUSA Maria Dominguez to review Martínez-Hernández's files; Dominguez confirmed that Torres did not have any involvement in Martínez-Hernández's prosecutions. Torres said that she informed Martínez-Hernández of this as well.

         It is evident that Martínez-Hernández hired Torres precisely because her prior affiliation with the USAO might benefit him in plea negotiations. That expectation seemed to be correct in light of the deal reached.

         On August 7, 2012, Martínez-Hernández pleaded guilty in case 11-241 to conspiracy with intent to distribute controlled substances within 1,000 feet of property comprising a school, public housing project, and/or playground. The offense carried a mandatory minimum of ten years of imprisonment and a maximum of life imprisonment. Under the plea agreement,[1] the parties agreed that Martínez-Hernández could request 264 months of imprisonment, and the government could request 324 months of imprisonment; the government agreed to dismiss with prejudice three other federal criminal cases against Martínez-Hernández (99-351, 99-352, and 01-379); [2] Martínez-Hernández could request that the sentence run concurrently with the sentences imposed for the Puerto Rico first-degree murder convictions; and Martínez-Hernández could request that his sentence run concurrently with any time he might be sentenced to in a federal revocation proceeding. The plea was made pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, so if the court did not accept the sentence recommendation, either Martínez-Hernández or the government could withdraw the plea.

         After the plea was entered but before sentencing, on August 16, 2012, attorney Luis Rafael Rivera entered a notice of appearance on behalf of Martínez-Hernández.

Page 43

Torres and Castro filed motions to withdraw as Martínez-Hernández's attorneys the ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.