Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Levin

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit

October 27, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant,
v.
ALEX LEVIN, Defendant, Appellee.

         APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge.

          Kelly Begg Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Carmen M. Ortiz, United States Attorney, was on brief, for appellant.

          J. W. Carney, Jr., with whom Nathaniel Dolcort-Silver and J. W. Carney, Jr. & Associates were on brief, for appellee.

          Mark Rumold, with whom Andrew Crocker, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Jessie J. Rossman and American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, were on brief, as amici curiae.

          Caroline Wilson Palow, Scarlet Kim and Privacy International on brief, as amici curiae.

          Before Torruella, Selya, and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

          TORRUELLA, CIRCUIT JUDGE.

         Central to this case is the Federal Bureau of Investigation's ("FBI" or "government") use of software that it terms a Network Investigative Technique ("NIT"). The FBI used the NIT pursuant to a warrant it obtained from a magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Virginia (the "NIT warrant"). The FBI installed the NIT on Playpen, a child pornography website it had taken over and was operating out of Virginia. The NIT attached itself to anything that was downloaded from Playpen, and thus effectively travelled to the computers that were downloading from the website, regardless of where those computers were located. The NIT then caused those computers to transmit several specific items of information -- which would allow the FBI to locate the computers -- back to the FBI.

         One computer the FBI located in this manner belonged to Alex Levin of Norwood, Massachusetts. After a search of his computer pursuant to a subsequent search warrant issued in Massachusetts, the FBI found various media files allegedly containing child pornography. Levin was indicted and charged with one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). Levin moved to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to the NIT warrant and the warrant issued in Massachusetts. The district court granted suppression, United States v. Levin, 186 F.Supp.3d 26, 44 (D. Mass. 2016), and the government appealed. We disagree with the district court that suppression is warranted, because the FBI acted in good faith reliance on the NIT warrant. Accordingly, we vacate the district court's suppression order and remand for further proceedings.[1]

         I. Background

         A. Playpen and the Dark Web

         Child-pornography websites are a source of significant social harm. "[T]he exploitive use of children in the production of pornography" was already "a serious national problem" decades ago. New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 749 (1982). Modern technology, which allows images and videos to be "traded with ease on the [i]nternet, " has only amplified the problem. Paroline v. United States, 134 S.Ct. 1710, 1717 (2014). The child-pornography website at the center of this case -- and several dozen other cases throughout the nation[2] -- bore the name "Playpen."

         Playpen attracted web traffic on a massive scale. Just between August 2014 and February 2015, more than 150, 000 users accessed the site. Visitors to Playpen made over 95, 000 posts on over 9, 000 topics, all pertaining to child pornography. Playpen also featured discussion forums where its users discussed issues such as how to groom child victims and how to evade law enforcement.

         Playpen operated on the internet network known as Tor (short for "The Onion Router"). This network, together with similar networks, is known as the Dark Web. The United States Naval Research Laboratory originally created Tor as a means of protecting government communications. Today, however, the Tor network is publicly accessible. One gains access to the Tor network by downloading the Tor software. By masking its users' actual IP addresses -- which could otherwise be used to identify users -- that software offers its users much greater anonymity than do conventional web browsers. Tor achieves this masking by bouncing users' communications around a distributed network of relay computers run by volunteers all around the world. The Tor software can be used to access the conventional internet as well as the Dark Web.

         Websites on the Dark Web, known as hidden services, can be reached only by using Tor software, or a similar software. Playpen was one such hidden service. Unlike websites on the conventional internet, hidden services cannot be accessed through public search engines such as Google. Hidden services can be accessed by using their addresses, if known to the person seeking to access the hidden service, or by being redirected to them. The latter can occur when, for instance, a link to a hidden service is posted on another hidden service and a user clicks that link.

         Because Playpen was a hidden service, a Playpen user had to take several affirmative steps to access the site. First, he or she needed to download and install the Tor software. Second, the user would need to acquire the unique web address for Playpen. Third, the user would use this address to find Playpen in the Tor Network. And finally, he or she needed to enter a username and password on Playpen's main page to access the site's content. The main page displayed "two images depicting partially clothed prepubescent females with their legs spread apart." Thus, Playpen's subject matter was obvious even before the user logged in and accessed the child-pornography content.

         B. The ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.